HSEVCKF7525ULT Hockey Stick EVOLUTION CKF75 UltimateV2_Teal_Flat Back HALF

Mercian Evolution CKF75 Ultimate V2 Hockey Stick

37.5" / Silver Carbon / Aqua
£190.00
Skip to product information
HSEVCKF7525ULT Hockey Stick EVOLUTION CKF75 UltimateV2_Teal_Flat Back HALF

Mercian Evolution CKF75 Ultimate V2 Hockey Stick

£190.00
Length
ColourSilver Carbon / Aqua
🚚 Free UK shipping over £180 🔒 Secure checkout · SSL encrypted
◎
Drag flicks,
aerials & 3D
▲
Balanced / Direct
★
Ultimate V2

Not sure this is the right stick for you?
Get help choosing your stick · Compare all Ultimate V2 sticks

CKF75 Ultimate V2 — specialist low bow with a Balanced / Direct response

The Evolution CKF75 Ultimate V2 is for players whose hockey genuinely benefits from an aggressive low bow — particularly drag flicking, aerials, lifting and 3D play — and who want a Balanced / Direct response.

Why choose the CKF75 Ultimate V2?

Choose this stick when Ultimate V2 shape solves a real skill requirement and you want a construction positioned in Mercian's Balanced / Direct response band.

The bend and the response answer two different questions. Ultimate V2 provides the specialist low-bow shape. Balanced / Direct describes where this construction sits in the current Mercian response range. Neither makes the CKF75 automatically better than another stick; they describe the requirement it is designed to meet.

Ultimate V2 bend / shape

Ultimate V2 is Mercian's aggressive specialist low-bow route for players who materially use skills such as drag flicking, aerials, lifting and 3D play.

On the CKF75 Ultimate V2, the current specification gives a 24.5 mm maximum bend at 200 mm from the head. Choose that shape because those skills matter to your hockey — not simply because it is a specialist bend.

Balanced / Direct response

The CKF75 Ultimate V2 sits in the Balanced / Direct part of Mercian's current outdoor range.

Its construction combines 75% high-quality Toray carbon with a 15% fibreglass skeleton and 10% Kevlar. The carbon contributes stiffness and a more direct response; fibreglass remains part of the overall construction rather than carbon percentage telling the whole story; Kevlar supports durability, stiffness and laminate bonding.

Nano-polymer resin strengthens the bond between the composite layers and helps reduce the risk of delamination. The useful customer outcome is the Balanced / Direct response. The percentages explain how the stick is built; they are not a quality or player-level score.

Touch, control and vibration management

  • High-friction face finish: fine silicon-polymer particles increase contact friction and add damping at impact.
  • M-Gel in the handle: helps absorb vibration from power skills such as hitting and slapping.
  • Piezo-electric vibration-control fibres: provide an additional damping system.
  • Cold Touch lacquer: provides the stick's cool-touch surface finish.

These features help explain the finished feel of the stick. They do not replace the more important bend and response decisions.

When another current option may suit better

If you want to keep Ultimate V2 but change the response, the current Mercian range gives you other positions to compare. CKF35 Ultimate V2 sits at the softer end of the current Ultimate V2 choice, while CKF90 Ultimate V2, CK95 Ultimate V2 and CK95SC Ultimate V2 sit in Direct / Powerful.

If you want to remain in the Balanced / Direct response band but a concave face is itself the specialist requirement, compare the CKF75 DSH.

Those are different requirements, not upgrades and downgrades.

Sizes

Current CKF75 Ultimate V2 variants are available in 36.5" and 37.5". For adult players, length is a handling-and-reach trade-off rather than a player-level rule.

Still comparing?

Understand Mercian stick bends
See every current Ultimate V2 stick by response
Understand Power, Touch & Carbon
Return to Guided Stick Choice

You may also like

OUTDOOR STICK GUIDANCE

Check the player requirement before you buy.

Outdoor choice starts with fit and the hockey you actually play. Bend, shape and construction should explain a useful difference, not create a good-better-best ladder.

Is the length workable? What hockey must it support? Would a specialist shape help the way you play? Which response can the player use?

Position, player level and carbon percentage can help describe a stick, but none of them automatically decides what suits you.